Difference between revisions of "Benchmark Intel"
From Eigen
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The purpose of this page is to show the comparison of the best performing BLAS/LAPACK implementations and Eigen2 on an Intel(R) Pentium(R) D | + | The purpose of this page is to show the comparison of the best performing BLAS/LAPACK implementations and Eigen2 on an Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU. By ''best performing'' I mean Intel MKL, GotoBLAS, ATLAS, and [http://developer.amd.com/cpu/Libraries/acml/downloads/pages/default.aspx ACML] (by AMD). Other implementations of BLAS/LAPACK are notably slower (see [[benchmark]]) and therefore not worth testing (and using). ACML was not included in the original [[benchmark]]. |
== 13 February 2009 == | == 13 February 2009 == | ||
'''Configuration:''' | '''Configuration:''' | ||
− | * '''CPU:''' Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz | + | * '''CPU:''' Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz (model name: Prescott) |
* '''Compiler:''' gcc version 4.3.3 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 143673] (OpenSUSE 11.1 64-bit) | * '''Compiler:''' gcc version 4.3.3 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 143673] (OpenSUSE 11.1 64-bit) | ||
'''Libraries:''' | '''Libraries:''' |
Latest revision as of 03:28, 15 March 2009
The purpose of this page is to show the comparison of the best performing BLAS/LAPACK implementations and Eigen2 on an Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU. By best performing I mean Intel MKL, GotoBLAS, ATLAS, and ACML (by AMD). Other implementations of BLAS/LAPACK are notably slower (see benchmark) and therefore not worth testing (and using). ACML was not included in the original benchmark.
13 February 2009
Configuration:
- CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz (model name: Prescott)
- Compiler: gcc version 4.3.3 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 143673] (OpenSUSE 11.1 64-bit)
Libraries:
- eigen2: Revision: 939062. SSE2, SSE3 enabled
- ACML: version 4.2.0 compiled with gfortran
- MKL: version 10.1
- Goto BLAS: version 1.26
- ATLAS: version 3.8.3